Why I’m Glad Twitter Doesn’t Allow Editing01 Jan 2017
Hear me out. While typos and grammar issues are inevitable in the absence of editing, there is a subtle way to use this as a lens into your thinking. I view tweets as atomic units. Immutable snapshots about your life that you can thread together with others over time.
Thought: Twitter is (potentially) an RSS-like feed for your life— Jasdev Singh (@jasdev) November 30, 2016
Twitter threads with other users are gold mines of insight. But, there is untapped value in longitudinal threads—over time—with yourself1. The lack of editing gives you the opportunity to posit something, sit with it, and revisit your stance at a later point2. If Twitter allowed editing with a revision history, the history would likely be tucked away in a submenu3, squandering its usefulness. The deltas revealed through threads gives us a peek into our thought processes, instead of focusing on editing a single, polished snapshot in-place.
Nikhil Krishnan’s tweets embody this approach. Below are some of his truncated threads4 (along with a personal example). Remember, what’s important here is that these threads evolve over time and aren’t simply one-time bursts.
Future of Consumer Products and the Focused Product Ecosystem
This point talks about the ecosystem aspect around a product essentially pic.twitter.com/VvP2TjkVrw— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) June 5, 2016
Toothpaste choice paralysis in action pic.twitter.com/lkiZrmvAMS— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) June 25, 2016
Allbirds is an interesting case study in the consumer product ecosystem. So far, it fits into my posthttps://t.co/yWsHB4ypYp— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) September 7, 2016
The Communication of Tomorrow
I wrote a post about what the communication of tomorrow might look like. Emojis and one-bit communication galore: http://t.co/hsDUN86iLV— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) July 21, 2015
Interesting use of one-bit communication. ReplyYes would remove choice paralysis + lower friction to buying: https://t.co/dV9kX4bBix— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) April 15, 2016
Targeting collectors is smart. Sticky+have disposable income+want to see good deals as fast as possible. Tough part is nailing down taste— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) April 15, 2016
This is a very relevant read to some of the science and social factors behind emojis: https://t.co/g9ISBlj5Hj— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) April 19, 2016
Was just reading this, good read about gifs and changing in communication and why that's important https://t.co/E6ySX9FvQm— Nikhil Krishnan (@nikillinit) May 9, 2016
Thoughts on Friendship
1/ A litmus test for how close you are w/ someone is the presence or absence of the urge to justify breaks in conversation …— Jasdev Singh (@jasdev) October 31, 2016
2/ (i.e. “brb gotta get back to work”). The latter _usually_ implies that your conversation is ‘always-on,’ which, for me, is the sign of …— Jasdev Singh (@jasdev) October 31, 2016
3/ a close friend. Unpacked this thought a bit more in an old posthttps://t.co/YGjNQoVeEc— Jasdev Singh (@jasdev) October 31, 2016
I’ve experimented with extending this approach to my (incomplete) collection of personal documents. By keeping an enumerated core values list, daily list, and beliefs under version control, I can reflect on when and how they changed. The ability to edit in-place would erase this history.
Scoping out, there might be a deeper concept at play here. The revisiting of older tweets—through threads—almost mirrors what we do in our heads through a process known as memory reconsolidation. “Research has shown that every time we recall a memory, it undergoes reconsolidation, meaning we are able to add new information or a different interpretation to our remembrance, even turning fearful memories into fearless ones5.” It’s almost as if these threads are a digital manifestation of reconsolidation. Through it, we can let go of previously strongly-held opinions, find holes in old arguments, and incorporate new learnings.
So, while we may collectively groan at the inability to edit tweets, I’m thankful. The lack of editing forces us to think out loud with clear revisions over time. It’s as if we have backstage access to “some great [collective] super-genius for the ages.”
Really grateful for Twitter. Seeing the tweets flow by feels like access to some great super-genius for the ages. (Quite serious.)— michael_nielsen (@michael_nielsen) April 11, 2016
Related Thoughts and Footnotes:
⇒ Mental noting in meditation serves as a good first step in the ability to reconsolidate more effectively.
⇒ I wonder if there would be value in authors including drafts of their work, when purchasing a book. Much like open source repositories with a full revision history, drafts could give us insight into their process. Here are some thoughts on this in the replies to a (deleted) tweet of mine.
Aside from the typical one-time threads that aren’t revisited later. ↩
Much like Facebook’s approach to this ↩
Embedded from the root tweet downwards. The threads are truncated for brevity. ↩